|
While
the concept of vying an artificial fly with fur and feathers onto a steel
hook is clearly of Old World origin, fly rodding for largemouth bass was,
until recent years. an indigenous, uniquely American pastime. The first
warmwater fly was tied not by a country squire in the hills of Devonshire,
but more likely by a fugitive slave
hiding among the Seminoles deep in the Everglades. When the naturalist,
William Bartram, traveled through Florida in the late eighteenth century,
he found native Americans and runaway Africans tying and fishing a crude
fly that they called a "bob." Simply constructed with bits of
red garter and white bucktail, the bob continued to take bass well into
the twentieth century. That kind of functional pragmatism would characterize
warmwater fly fishing until the "yuppiazation" of the sport
two centuries later.
Bass fishing and fly fishing were not separate avocations to former generations
of anglers, who unabashedly switched back and forth from the casting rod
as conditions demanded. The fly rod was not a symbol of social status,
nor was there any stigma attached to bait casting tackle. They were simply
alternative tools for the same purpose. Today's rigid polarization didn't
develop until the early 1970's, when a deep schism developed between bass
and fly fishers. Whatever the causes - the invention of the spinning reel,
the building of the big impoundments, tournament fishing - warmwater anglers
fled to the casting rod in droves, leaving American fly fishing
exclusively in the hands of northern trout fishers. When the Federation
of Fly Fishers was formed in 1968, bass bugging was, for all practical
purposes, a dead sport, and a stated goal of that fledgling organization
was to encourage a renaissance of warmwater angling. But fly fishers continued
to distance themselves from bass fishing, purifying and sterilizing warmwater
fly fishing by encumbering it with all sorts of arcane trappings and trouting
traditions.
This exodus of warmwater anglers led to a demographic restructuring of
American angling along cultural and socioeconomic lines, and by the late
1970 the reorganization was complete. The Whitlock revolution of the early
eighties failed to reinvigorate the fly rod among bass fishers, but did
succeed in making the homely sport more acceptable to what had become
a very elitist fly fishing community. The old pragmatism, represented
by anglers like Torn Nixon and Tom McNally, was rejected. The use of miniature
plugs, pork rind, spinners and soft plastic lures oil a fly line was no
longer acceptable. This confinement of warmwater fly fishing within such
parameters virtually ensured that the hoped-for renaissance would not
happen. Due to a number of factors, including the feeding behavior of
the species, fly fishing for bass became a form of angling asceticism,
appealing only to a few ideologically-driven purists, myself included,
who chose to ignore the fact that the lake-dwelling largemouth is vulnerable
to surface techniques only for brief periods during certain seasons. When
bass refused topwater offerings, my attempts at deep fly fishing normally
yielded only ridicule from my bass fishing counterparts. The new refinements
were simply unproductive for bottom-grubbing, lethargic, basking or non-feeding
bass - which is the normal state of affairs on public lakes.
The warmwater philosophy of earlier fly rodders, respected trout fishers
like Ray Bergman and Joe Brooks, was viewed
as a quaint aberration from a different era. Bergman erected a philosophical
wall between insect feeding trout and panfish on the one hand and bass
on the other. It wasn't unusual for him to cast tiny dries to Catskill
browns with a split cane rod one week, and chunk a strip of pork rind
on the casting rod to Florida largemouth the next. And he did not hesitate
to cast any sort of lure that his fly line would carry. As he said in
his 1942 classic on bass fishing:
"Although I am a trout angler and have all the dry fly fisherman's
prejudices, I forget them all when fishing for bass."
I didn't know about Bergman's wall when I started fly fishing in warmwaters
in 1980 after twenty- five years of trout fishing. Dave Whitlock spoke
my language. His artistically sculpted imitations of real food forms were
aesthetically pleasing and permitted me to bass fish with my fly rod without
compromising my coldwater principles.
I did not speak Tom Nixon's language. A contemporary of Whitlock, Nixon
talked about spinner baits dressed with surveyor's tape and plastic worms,
which he cast on a cheap glass rod with a foot cut off the tip to make
it stiffer. I emulated Dave Whitlock instead, who cast only real flies,
with tight, crisp loops on the finest graphite rod. I didn't realize at
the time that Tom represented the mainstream of American warmwater angling,
while Dave advocated a revolutionary new approach.
Tom Nixon's tactics seemed crude, corny and out of style. I rejected him
out of hand. But after years of frustration and mediocre results, I grew
weary of fly fishing martyrdom; weary of fighting awkward sinking lines
and unproductive flies; weary of catching fish only at dusk and dawn.
Most of all, I grew weary of putting ideology over pragmatism. I decided
I wanted to catch some bass for a change. The time had come to learn Tom's
language.
The
second edition of his FLY TYING AND FLY FISHING FOR BASS AND PANFISH appeared
in 1977, right at the beginning of the Whitlock Revolution and, although
Dave himself acknowledged Nixon's contribution, the book was generally
ignored by the fly fishing community at large. It sat on my shelf unread
for a decade, until I rediscovered it last year. Learning to apply Tom's
techniques has changed my fly fishing life. Fishing spinner baits, jigs
and especially soft plastic lures on a fly line has produced results that
are best described as awesome. The ridicule of my casting rod friends
has turned to respect for the fly rod. Thanks to Tom Nixon, l am regularly
outfishing them on their own waters.
|